From: | phillip.reed |
Date: | 5 Jun 2001 at 22:25:38 |
Subject: | Re: graphics cards |
the geforce 3 costs a minimum of £300 and i know its a lot, but its not like
us amigans are used to be paying over the top for something that doesnt give
much... but the geforce gives best performance, but at a price... one of
the matrox cards, dos cost over £850 !!! i have no idea what that does...
----- Original Message -----
From: Jan-Erik Karlsson <TRG@privat.utfors.se>
To: <amigactive@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 10:54 PM
Subject: [amigactive] Re: graphics cards
> KM > Hmm, you've obviously never seen a game running at 1600x1200x32 with
> KM > anti-aliasing and full detail turned on.
i havent no...
> KM > A friend of mine recently compared benchmarks (of a real app) for a
PC
> KM > running an nVidia Geforce3 and a 300,000 pound SGI machine. There was
> KM > very little in it.
what machine is it ?
> you ain't buying a 300,000 pound SGI machine to play games.
>
! the only ones buying the geforce3 is
> those that belives microsoft when they state that window's ME is a must
> buy!
those who buy a geforce 3, want performance, they get it.
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/